(you’ll need to have an account on FetLife to view the above link and any other links leading to FetLife; if you don’t already have an account, it’s free to sign up and all you need to do so is have a valid email address and be able to spare a couple minutes of your time - it’s worth it, if only for the LOLz)
Why, yes, yes it does!
There are actually people on FetLife, who aren’t completely stupid. WHO KNEW??!
There Are Some Sick Fucks About …
Specifically, these sick fucks believe that it is okay to engage in sexual activity with animals, even though animals cannot consent to sexual activity with human beings. These sick fucks believe it is okay to engage in sexual activity WITHOUT the consent of all parties involved.
No, it is NOT just a kink. No, it is NOT just a fetish. No, it is NOT a sexual orientation. It is ABUSE. It is TORTURE. It is CRUELTY.
Just like pedophiles and other sexual predators, they don’t see what they are doing as the abuse, torture, and cruelty that it actually is. They see it as “love.” Only sick, disturbed individuals can mistake abuse, torture, and cruelty with love.
These people should be judged. What they are doing is wrong legally and morally (the morals of basic human decency). What they are doing is predatory, an abuse of their position of power over animals, and a breach of the role of (supposed) caretaker of these animals. They are violating the trust animals place in them. They are violating animals PERIOD. Physically, mentally, and emotionally.
THE SICK FUCK LIST
(AKA people who fuck animals and don’t believe they’re doing anything wrong; people who condone, support, promote, advocate for humans fucking animals)
Keep yourselves safe because there are people out there like this. You are welcome to engage in friendly debate with these people :)
The following are members of the groups - real zoo people, (to be continued):
I made my post in response/protest to this post (“There are some vigilantes about…”) and this post (“They are out to get you”). Both posts were made by the user ZooLiberation, who also is FetusFlinger (formerly Fuck_The_System).
Side Note: Before making my post, I reported this post of ZooLiberation’s to the FetLife Caretakers on 2-15-2012. I waited to receive a return email letting me know whether or not said post violated FetLife TOU. I never received one. I waited for said post to be deleted by the FetLife Caretakers if they so deemed it a violation of FetLife TOU. It was never deleted. So, on or about March 1st, I made the post I’ve shared above, deducing (from the Caretakers’ non-response to my email and failure to delete the post I reported) that making such a post was NOT against FetLife TOU. Apparently, it IS against FetLife TOU, but only for specific users. Others, like ZooLiberation, are exempt for some unknown reason.
The posts by ZooLiberation are singling out individual users (in list form), calling them vigilantes, implying they are dangerous to ZooLiberation and her fellow zoophiles/zoos/animal abusers (merely based on the fact that they disagree with ZooLiberation and her ilk, believe that zoophilia/bestiality/animal abuse is wrong, and make it known that they believe this).
- The Humane Society of the United States, the nation’s largest animal protection organization, “praise[ed] Alaska state lawmakers for passing legislation Saturday that will make the most egregious acts of cruelty to animals a felony on the first offense, and also will prohibit the sexual abuse of animals. [They go on to say that they believe that] perpetrators of animal cruelty are a threat, not only to animals, but also to our communities […]”
- The American Humane Association state that “studies illustrate a strong connection between sexual abuse of people and sexual conduct with animals, for the welfare of both people and animals, the law must treat all acts of violence against animals seriously. [And] even in cases where physical harm does not occur to the animal, bestiality is still a cruel activity because animals, like children and incapacitated adults, lack the ability to clearly consent or refuse.”
But what do they know, amirite?
It’s been said that my post violates the part of FetLife’s TOU, which states, “You agree that, while using BitLove Inc.’s Products and Services, you will not: […] Make criminal accusations against another member in a public forum.”
But, uh, in this post, ZooLiberation, calls the people she’s singling out in her list “vigilantes.”
And in this post, ZooLiberation, calls the people she’s singling out, “anti-zoo vigilantes.” She does so twice in this particular post.
Last time I checked, vigilantism is illegal in the United States, so calling a group of people “vigilantes” is making a “criminal accusation against another member in a public forum,” isn’t it? Hint: It is.
She also infers that her and her fellow zoophiles/zoos/animal abusers will not be “safe from harassment” at the hands of those she singles out in her list.
Last time I checked, harassment is illegal in the United States, so saying that a group of people is “out to get you” along with saying that you aren’t “safe from harassment if they find you” is making a “criminal accusation against another member in a public forum,” isn’t it? Hint: It is.
It’s been said that my post violates the part of FetLife’s TOU, which states, “You agree that, while using BitLove Inc.’s Products and Services, you will not: […] Personally attack, make fun of, troll, flame, bully, stalk or otherwise harass another member.”
But, uh, in this post, ZooLiberation has made a list including links to both posts in groups and a post in a user’s journal section of their profile.
And in this post, ZooLiberation has a made a list of links to specific FetLife users.
Don’t you think that making and posting lists of specific FetLife users, their posts to groups, and their posts in their journals, along with an invitation in one of the posts that, “you are welcome to engage in friendly debate with these people :)” and a warning in the other post that those she’s speaking to (zoophiles/zoos/animal abusers) aren’t safe from those she’s listed is pretty much a tacit, if not completely blatant, approval of and invitation to “personally attack, make fun of, troll, flame, bully, stalk or otherwise harass” those she’s singled out in her lists? Hint: It is.
If my post was against FetLife’s TOU for the above mentioned reasons, why aren’t ZooLiberation’s posts against FetLife’s TOU, as well? She commits the same abuses of FetLife TOU that I’ve been accused of making. So, why does she get a free pass to do so? Does FetLife have a special place in their heart for zoos/zoophiles/animal abusers? It would appear so, methinks. Either that, or they just don’t give a shit and are only concerned with finding the most efficient way to make their website as profitable as possible. When it comes down to it, it’s really only money that matters to FetLife and John Baku.
So as not to deposit only a TL;DR post full o’ text, I would like to end this post with several apropos images that I, myself, have created.
But before I do, I must say: DON’T you dare STEAL my ART, ‘kay?!!!
Do you know how many hours, days, and weeks (sometimes months and years) of arduous, dedicated work I spent creating my l’art? INCALCULABLE! Do you know how much creative effort and energy was used to create my l’art? INCALCULABLE! Do you know how much I would lose if you were to STEAL my l’art? INCALCULABLE!
And don’t you DARE tell me that adding text to easily found images (or backgrounds of single/various colors) on the internet ISN’T l’art!!! It totes IS, ‘kay?!!!!
Side Note: I make the above tongue-in-cheek demands due to the fact that ZooLiberation/FetusFlinger/Fuck_The_System has recently made an image AND a post declaring that artists and photographers are hypocrites if they have “ever shared any sort of media […] but complain about other people posting [their] work.”
YET, she got clinically, pathologically butthurt when I posted her “art,” which is nothing more than shitty, MS Paint graphics consisting of either just text OR images (oh, the diversity! oh, the range!) with text (although, they do say that one person’s art is another person’s shitty, MS Paint graphic, don’t they?).
Granted, I made some very (minimal) additions to her “art,” but I was just inspired by her, man, and wanted to make something similar with my own spin to it as an ode to her, man. She should have appreciated the free publicity (she suggests other artists and photographers to do exactly this in her above post) that I so graciously gave her!
This is just one example of ZooLiberation’s hypocrisy. She also screams from the proverbial rooftops of the internetz that she’s passionately, rabidly against censorship, but, uh, look how quick she was to censor me for disagreeing with her. So, basically, she wants to make sure that KKK members, neo-nazis, and homophobes aren’t censored, but when it comes to someone disagreeing with and speaking out against her zoophilia/bestiality/animal abuse, CENSOR AWAY!
Without further adieu, my images … errr, no wait … my l’art!!!!!